http://www.caaflog.com/2007/12/24/nmcca-affirms-article-10-dismissal/ Covering the Military Justice System Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:57:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.caaflog.com/2007/12/24/nmcca-affirms-article-10-dismissal/comment-page-1/#comment-1796 Anonymous Wed, 26 Dec 2007 23:21:00 +0000 http://tx18.westnic.net/~caaflog/?p=815#comment-1796 Forgive my ignorance, but is Art. 10 designed as a self-policing measure of the fast-moving military judicial system? Forgive my ignorance, but is Art. 10 designed as a self-policing measure of the fast-moving military judicial system?

]]> http://www.caaflog.com/2007/12/24/nmcca-affirms-article-10-dismissal/comment-page-1/#comment-1795 John O'Connor Tue, 25 Dec 2007 18:07:00 +0000 http://tx18.westnic.net/~caaflog/?p=815#comment-1795 I agree with CAAFlog (though I, unliek CAAFlog (I think), believe that Code 46 has it wrong as to whether CAAF has jurisdiction. I agree with CAAFlog (though I, unliek CAAFlog (I think), believe that Code 46 has it wrong as to whether CAAF has jurisdiction.

]]> http://www.caaflog.com/2007/12/24/nmcca-affirms-article-10-dismissal/comment-page-1/#comment-1794 CAAFlog Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:50:00 +0000 http://tx18.westnic.net/~caaflog/?p=815#comment-1794 Kabul Klipper -- remember that the Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Government Division (Code 46) took the position in Lopez de Victoria and Michael that CAAF has no jurisdiction to review a CCA's ruling on an Article 62 appeal. So unless CAAF releases an opinion repudiating that view in the next 24 days, it would seem rather hypocritical for Code 46 to seek certification. Kabul Klipper — remember that the Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Government Division (Code 46) took the position in Lopez de Victoria and Michael that CAAF has no jurisdiction to review a CCA’s ruling on an Article 62 appeal. So unless CAAF releases an opinion repudiating that view in the next 24 days, it would seem rather hypocritical for Code 46 to seek certification.

]]>