We’ve had another Coastie friend throw another CGCCA opinion over our electronic transom. Here’s a link. United States v. Hupp, Dkt. No. 1284 (C.G. Ct. Crim. App. Jan. 26, 2009). Once again, I have insufficient information to know whether it’s published.

2 Responses to “Another CGCCA opinion”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Now that the thread regarding Cox Commission has fallen to page 2 I just wanted to make sure the “we hate Dew” string keeps going. Bad, Bad Dew.

    BTW, I’ve got 6 degrees of hearsay info that this scumball Martinez did actually do it. Anybody have it at 5 degrees (other than his counsel)?

  2. Dew_Process says:

    Glad to keep your mind occupied, ANON 1132.