We previously discussed AFCCA’s published opinion in United States v. Webb, __ M.J. __, No. 2009-01 (pet) (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. March 20, 2009), which found that a court-martial had jurisdiction to prosecute Webb even though he had received his DD 214 and final accounting of pay. We also looked at CAAF’s order halting the trial. United States v. Webb, __ M.J. ___, No. 09-8020/AF (C.A.A.F. March 20, 2009). Yesterday CAAF denied Webb’s writ appeal without prejudice and vacated the stay of proceedings. United States v. Webb, __ M.J. ___, No. 09-8020/AF (C.A.A.F. Apr. 29, 2009) (summary disposition).

Comments are closed.