We noted that AFCCA will be hearing oral argument on 24 September at Creighton University’s law school.  Here are the two issues being argued in United States v. Bruhn, No. ACM 37291:

III.

Whether the actions of the staff judge advocate an investigators breached the attorney-client relationship and impermissibly tainted the investigation and court-martial.

IV.

Whether the military judge committed prejudicial error in denying the court-martial panel’s request for phone records from a witness.

Comments are closed.