This week in military justice — St. Crispin’s Day 2009 edition
Happy St. Crispin’s Day!
This week at the Supremes: The pro se IFP cert petition in Brewer v. United States, No. 09-6800, has been distributed for Friday’s conference.
This week at CAAF: CAAF has no oral arguments scheduled this week. It’s now been just more than a month since the first five cases of the term were argued. It’s probably still a bit early to send a look-out up to the CAAFlog crow’s nest.
This week at the CCAs: On Tuesday, the case of United States v. Stevenson returns to NMCCA yet again. Here are the issues being argued:
II. WHETHER THE SEARCH WARRANT WAS VALID IN LIGHT OF APPELLANT’S ARGUMENT THAT STATEMENTS AND OMISSIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE WERE NOT MADE IN GOOD FAITH.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRj01LShXN8&feature=PlayList&p=2E499BE816D39264
Are the briefs available somewhere? This would be interesting to read in light of the City of Charleston opinion by Stevens.
I agree with JWS. Especially where there is a history of military cases where “civilian” actors (e.g. Exchange security personnel) are held to law enforcement standards.
By that I mean Ferguson v City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2001).
Henry V’s St Crispin Day’s speech – courtesy of Shakespeare:
“If we are mark’d to die, we are enow
To do our country loss; and if to live,
The fewer men, the greater share of honour.
God’s will! I pray thee, wish not one man more.”
“We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
And gentlemen in England now-a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs’d they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin’s day.”
Anniversary of the Battle of Agincourt, n’est pas?
That’s the general idea. One of many battles fought during the 100 years war (actually 116 years of on off combat) between the English and les frogs.