Here’s a link to a media advisory that Vanderbilt Law School issued about tomorrow’s CAAF argument at the school.

4 Responses to “Media advisory about CAAF Project Outreach argument”

1. No Man says:

   November 2, 2009 at 10:35 pm

   Slight inaccuracy in the Vanderbilt press release:

   The court’s decisions are appealable to the U.S. Supreme Court.

   That would all depend on who you ask, I guess.
2. Anonymous says:

   November 4, 2009 at 6:21 am

   Interesting there is no case caption or summary or identification of who will argue for the appellant.
3. Phil Cave says:

   November 4, 2009 at 10:21 am

   None of appellant’s counsel went to Vanderbilt so they don’t count.
4. Anonymous says:

   November 4, 2009 at 2:07 pm

   Captain Marla Gillman argued on behalf of appellant (not a Vandy alum and therefore not plugged by Vandy).
   The opinion below on Westlaw: 2008 WL 5192441.
   Appellant was convicted of possessing child pornography, and the issue had to do with the scope of the marital communications privilege under M.R.E. 504(b).