The Judge Advocate General of the Navy has certified Serianne to CAAF.  Here are the certified issues:

I.  WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY HELD THAT THE DUTY IMPOSED ON SAILORS BY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS INSTRUCTION 5350.4C TO NOTIFY THEIR COMMANDING OFFICER OF AN ARREST BY CIVIL AUTHORITY FOR AN ALCOHOL-RELATED OFFENSE COMPELLED A TESTIMONIAL COMMUNICATION THAT WAS INCRIMINATING.

II. WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY HELD THAT NO EXCEPTION TO THE FIFTH AMENDMENT SELF-INCRIMINATION CLAUSE, INCLUDING THE REGULATORY EXCEPTION DEVELOPED IN CALIFORNIA v. BYERS, APPLIES TO THE REPORTING REQUIREMENT IN CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS INSTRUCTION 5350.4C.

CAAF granted review of the following issue in Ayala, No.10-0013/AF:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN FINDING APPELLANT’S ADDITIONAL URINALYSES CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO UNITED STATES v. BICKEL, 30 M.J. 277 (C.M.A. 1990), WERE FOR A PERMISSIBLE PURPOSE.