Fascinating Walters-type issue (or, according to the government, fascinating non-Walters issue)
Thanks to our reader who provided us with a copy of the Saxman briefs. As we suspected, the case is fascinating. But don’t take my word for it — see for yourself. The defense’s brief is here. The government’s answer is here. And the defense’s reply brief is here. It should be a great oral argument. Can anyone tell us which judges are on Panel 2?
