<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAAF denies NACDL&#8217;s motion to participate in Diaz argument as amicus curiae</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caaflog.com/2010/01/17/caaf-denies-nacdls-motion-to-participate-in-diaz-argument-as-amicus-curiae/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caaflog.com/2010/01/17/caaf-denies-nacdls-motion-to-participate-in-diaz-argument-as-amicus-curiae/</link>
	<description>Covering the Military Justice System</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:07:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention CAAFlog » CAAF denies NACDL’s motion to participate in Diaz argument as amicus curiae -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.caaflog.com/2010/01/17/caaf-denies-nacdls-motion-to-participate-in-diaz-argument-as-amicus-curiae/#comment-11658</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention CAAFlog » CAAF denies NACDL’s motion to participate in Diaz argument as amicus curiae -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caaflog.com/?p=4291#comment-11658</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Cassese, CAAFLog. CAAFLog said: CAAF denies NACDL’s motion to participate in Diaz argument as amicus curiae http://tinyurl.com/ybggxao [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Cassese, CAAFLog. CAAFLog said: CAAF denies NACDL’s motion to participate in Diaz argument as amicus curiae <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ybggxao" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ybggxao</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.caaflog.com/2010/01/17/caaf-denies-nacdls-motion-to-participate-in-diaz-argument-as-amicus-curiae/#comment-11654</link>
		<dc:creator>John Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caaflog.com/?p=4291#comment-11654</guid>
		<description>Anon:  I&#039;ve seen the rule, but let me clarify:  Does CAAF (&amp;/or other military appellate courts) follow the unofficial rule that SCOTUS has and generally only allows amicus from &quot;known&quot; briefers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon:  I&#8217;ve seen the rule, but let me clarify:  Does CAAF (&amp;/or other military appellate courts) follow the unofficial rule that SCOTUS has and generally only allows amicus from &#8220;known&#8221; briefers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.caaflog.com/2010/01/17/caaf-denies-nacdls-motion-to-participate-in-diaz-argument-as-amicus-curiae/#comment-11647</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caaflog.com/?p=4291#comment-11647</guid>
		<description>Blah,  Diaz&#039;s counsel sought Amici assistance at the CAAF.

John Adams - Rule 26 of the CAAF Rules, governs Amici at the CAAF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blah,  Diaz&#8217;s counsel sought Amici assistance at the CAAF.</p>
<p>John Adams &#8211; Rule 26 of the CAAF Rules, governs Amici at the CAAF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.caaflog.com/2010/01/17/caaf-denies-nacdls-motion-to-participate-in-diaz-argument-as-amicus-curiae/#comment-11639</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caaflog.com/?p=4291#comment-11639</guid>
		<description>Anyone have the Amicus brief?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have the Amicus brief?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blah</title>
		<link>http://www.caaflog.com/2010/01/17/caaf-denies-nacdls-motion-to-participate-in-diaz-argument-as-amicus-curiae/#comment-11630</link>
		<dc:creator>blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caaflog.com/?p=4291#comment-11630</guid>
		<description>looks like they granted the brief and denied oral argument.  Probably just emulating SCOTUS

a lot of the times amici will try to push the court farther than defense counsel wants to go for purposes of their case.  I can see why that is helpful but I can also see why it might not be desired in certain cases where you just want to get relief for your guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like they granted the brief and denied oral argument.  Probably just emulating SCOTUS</p>
<p>a lot of the times amici will try to push the court farther than defense counsel wants to go for purposes of their case.  I can see why that is helpful but I can also see why it might not be desired in certain cases where you just want to get relief for your guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.caaflog.com/2010/01/17/caaf-denies-nacdls-motion-to-participate-in-diaz-argument-as-amicus-curiae/#comment-11629</link>
		<dc:creator>John Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caaflog.com/?p=4291#comment-11629</guid>
		<description>What is the basic guidance on CAAF (ACCA, etc.) granting amicus?  Generally only accept from name organizations or prawfs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the basic guidance on CAAF (ACCA, etc.) granting amicus?  Generally only accept from name organizations or prawfs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
