CAAF today granted review of a significant issue:  “Whether the lower court erred in holding that Article 120(c)(2), UCMJ, is not facially unconstitutional.”  United States v. Medina, __ M.J. ___, No. 10-0262/MC (C.A.A.F. March 30, 2010) (order granting review).  NMCCA’s en banc decision in the case is published at 68 M.J. 587.  The No Man’s analysis of that opinion is here.

One Response to “CAAF to consider Article 120(c)(2)’s constitutionality”

  1. Late Bloomer says:

    Ahhh…good ol’ Art. 120. Hopefully this is a new and different approach to it.