Here is a link to a local article from Ft. Hood that reports Maj. Hasan’s counsel John Galligan is alleging, I think, that any pre-trial confinement would be an Art. 13 violation. Through no fault of Mr. Galligan the story doesn’t lay out his argument, though it reports Mr. Galligan has laid out his position in a letter to the chief judge at Ft. Hood. Because the case hasn’t been referred, I don’t see the chief judge doing much about said letter. I would guess a Circuit Chief Judge wouldn’t want to be seen as potentially influencing the upcoming Art. 32 or any future Art. 13 motion.