Here are the three issues that the Judge Advocate General of the Navy certified to CAAF yesterday:
I. Whether the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals erred in finding, inter alia, that the military judge severed the attorney-client relationship with Captain Bass?
II. Whether under R.C.M. 505(d)(2)(B), the Navy-Marine Corps Court incorrectly found no “good cause” on the record for the replacement of Appellant’s second detailed defense counsel with another counsel?
III. Whether the lower court applied the wrong standard and erroneously presumed, without assessing, prejudice and set aside the findings and sentence, where Appellant’s statutory rights, and constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel, were satisfied throughout trial?