Snuffy offered the hilarious observation that CAAF “is building a trailer park” with all of its Fosler grants.  There’s another one today.  In United States v. Bernard, __ M.J. __, No. 11-0293/CG (C.A.A.F. Apr. 28, 2011), CAAF granted review of this familiar issue:

WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES.

2 Responses to “Another trailer in the park”

  1. soonergrunt says:

    The 706 board has ruled PFC Manning competent to stand trial.
    http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/04/manning-…