CAAF today granted review of this issue:

WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT DETERMINED THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED ERROR BY DENYING A PANEL MEMBER’S REQUEST TO CALL TWO ADDITIONAL WITNESSES FOR QUESTIONING, BUT FOUND THIS ERROR TO BE HARMLESS.

 United States v. Clifton, __ M.J. __, No. 12-0486/AR (C.A.A.F. Aug. 6, 2012).  ACCA’s unpublished decision in the case is available here.

 

Comments are closed.