CAAF today granted review of this issue:
WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT DETERMINED THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED ERROR BY DENYING A PANEL MEMBER’S REQUEST TO CALL TWO ADDITIONAL WITNESSES FOR QUESTIONING, BUT FOUND THIS ERROR TO BE HARMLESS.
United States v. Clifton, __ M.J. __, No. 12-0486/AR (C.A.A.F. Aug. 6, 2012). ACCA’s unpublished decision in the case is available here.