CAAF today granted review of this issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY OVERRULING DEFENSE COUNSEL’S FOUNDATION AND AUTHENTICATION OBJECTIONS AND ADMITTING COMPUTERIZED DATA EVIDENCE GATHERED BY AN UNNAMED NAVY-MARINE CORPS INTRANET (NMCI) ANALYST WHO USED AN UNIDENTIFIED PROCESS WITH UNKNOWN RELIABILITY TO COLLECT DATA RELATED TO APPELLANT’S NETWORK USER ACTIVITY.

United States v. Lubich, __ M.J. __, No. 12-0555/NA.  NMCCA’s unpublished opinion is available here. United States v. Lubich, No. NMCCA 201100378 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. Apr. 19, 2012) (per curiam).

One Response to “CAAF grant”

  1. Casual Reader says:

    Unnamed, unidentified and unknown.  No confrontation issues here.