Military justice blogs are to blogs
as military music is to music.
CAAF today granted review of this issue in an Army case:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE REJECTED APPELLANT’S PLEA BASED UPON A NECESSITY DEFENSE THAT IS NEITHER RECOGNIZED IN MILITARY COURT NOR APPLICABLE TO APPELLANT’S CASE
United States v. Holsey, __ M.J, __, No. 12-0597/AR (CA.A.F. Sept. 13, 2012). ACCA had affirmed the findings and sentence in a two-sentence summary disposition.
Comments are closed.
The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacities. They do not speak for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity. The views expressed in this blog are those of the individual authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of any military service, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. Click here for important disclaimers.
