Military justice blogs are to blogs
as military music is to music.
Here is a WSJ report on the Kansas Supreme Court’s decision to disbar former LCDR Matthew Diaz. The court ignored recommendations that would have allowed Diaz to resume the practice of law. See our prior coverage here. Here is a link to the opinion.
The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacities. They do not speak for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity. The views expressed in this blog are those of the individual authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of any military service, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. Click here for important disclaimers.
The court didn’t “ignore[] recommendations that would have allowed Diaz to resume the practice of law.” The court noted them and declined to follow those recommendations, and instead followed the recommendation for disbarment.
Fair enough, declined to follow. I’ve started to equate ignore and declined to follow now that I have a nine year old.
And since I was writing that as my six year old and nine year old were wrestling on the floor . . . I’m almost certain why it came out as ignore.