The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit yesterday issued this order summarily denying Earle Partington’s motion to fileĀ this post-argument memorandum addressing what “other lawyers” means in R.C.M. 109, which tasks the Judge Advocates General with the professional supervision and discipline of judge advocates and “other lawyers” who practice in courts in their respective services.

The case appears to be on a glide-path to affirmance, though likely on a somewhat different basis than that adopted by the district court.

Comments are closed.