Professor Steve Vladeck, one of the counsel on NACDL’s amicus brief in Behenna, No. 12-802, has posted this comment on the amicus brief.  Professor Vladeck explains that “by virtue of both its own jurisprudence and subsequent legislation, our brief explains why the Supreme Court should do more ‘error-correcting’ in military appeals than in any other category of cases.”

One Response to “More on NACDL’s Behenna amicus”

  1. Bridget Wilson says:

    Excellent brief. Not surprising, but worth the read.