Here’s a link to AFCCA’s published decision in United States v. Slagle, __ M.J. __, No. ACM 38087 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. May 14, 2013) (per curiam).  The court rejects the argument that 18 U.S.C. § 2252A’s maximum sentence doesn’t apply to an Article 134 child pornography conviction unless the specification alleges that the visual depiction is of an actual minor or is virtually indistinguishable from an actual minor.

Comments are closed.