Just got this motion for one of the Soybel cases.

2 Responses to “Soybel’d, a little more”

  1. Andrew Williams says:

    The AFCCA decision on the appointment of Mr. Soybel did not discuss the Supreme Court case of Ryder v. U.S., 515 U.S. 177 (1995).  I wonder how it applies.

  2. Phil Cave says:

    Here is my view.http://www.caaflog.com/wp-content/uploads/Jorell-C-38061-Motion-to-Vacate.pdfNot sure for the others.