16-961 ) DALMAZZI, NICOLE A. V. UNITED STATES
)
16-1017 ) COX, LAITH G. V. UNITED STATES
)
16-1423 ) ORTIZ, KEANU D. V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The
cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for
oral argument. In addition to the questions presented by the
petitions, the parties are directed to brief and argue the
following question: Whether this Court has jurisdiction to
review the cases in Nos. 16-961 and 16-1017 under 28 U. S. C.
§ 1259(3).

Link.

Thanks to Ryan Yoder for the tip.

5 Responses to “Breaking: Certiorari granted in Dalmazzi, Cox, and Ortiz”

  1. AF Capt says:

    Habemus Golden CAAF!

  2. David "Sid" Sheldon says:

    Nice job ALL CON!!!

  3. Isaac Kennen says:

    Zach,
    Nice call on predicting the specified issue:
     

    [T]he petition also implicates the jurisdiction-limiting provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1259 because CAAF’s per curiam opinion in this case vacated the grant of review.

     
    Dalmazzi petitions for certiorari, CAAFlog (1 Feb 17)

  4. The Silver Fox says:

    I just spit out my wine cooler.

  5. DCGoneGalt says:

    Haha, the Silver Fox drinks Bartles and James during the day.

Leave a Reply