Here is a link to a federal register notice of a meeting of the Judicial Proceedings Panel scheduled for November 14, 2014, at the Holiday Inn Arlington at Ballston, 4610 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203.
I inadvertently omitted an important military justice event from yesterday’s This Week in Military Justice post.
A public meeting of the Joint Service Committee will be held on Wednesday at CAAF, beginning at 10 a.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the proposed amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial (discussed here).
I’m planning to attend the meeting. I look forward to meeting any readers who might also be there.
The Military to Civilian Success for Legal Professionals Seminar (aka Jobs for JAGs) will be held Oct. 30, 2014 from 7:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m at the Crystal City Gateway Marriott, 1700 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington, VA. The event is co-sponsored by the Military Officers Association of America and the Judge Advocates Association. Registration link here.
Today’s Federal Register contains this public notice, 79 Fed. Reg. 59,937 (Oct. 3, 2014), of proposed changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial. The notice also solicits public comments regarding the proposed changes (due no later than December 2, 2014), and provides notice of a public meeting about the proposed changes to occur on October 29, 2014, at CAAF.
The proposed changes consume 22 pages in the Federal Register (shorter than the 34 pages of changes proposed in 2012 and only partially adopted in 2013). The proposed changes mainly implement the military justice reforms in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, signed into law by the President on December 26, 2013 (I discussed these reforms in a series of posts available here).
While much of the proposed changes are unremarkable, there are some surprises. For example, R.C.M. 405 (addressing the Article 32 process) is revised in its entirety (because of the revised Article 32 effective in December). The revised R.C.M. 405(h) states that
the Military Rules of Evidence do not apply in preliminary hearings under this rule except as follows . . . Mil. R. Evid. 412 shall apply in any case that includes a charge defined as a sexual offense in Mil. R. Evid. 412(d), except that Mil. R. Evid. 412(b)(1)(C) shall not apply. . . . [Mil. R. Evid.] 513(d)(8); and 514(d)(6) shall not apply.
79 Fed. Reg. at 59,941 (proposed R.C.M. 405(h)). These three Military Rules of Evidence that do not apply (412(b)(1)(c), 513(d)(8), and 514(d)(6)) are the constitutional exceptions to the general rules prohibiting admission of an alleged victim’s other sexual behavior or sexual predisposition (M.R.E. 412), establishing the psychotherapist-patient privilege (M.R.E. 513), and establishing the victim advocate privilege (M.R.E. 514).
The proposed changes emphasize that M.R.E. 412, 513, and 514 apply as exclusionary rules only, stating that the hearing officer “shall assume the military judge’s authority to exclude evidence from the preliminary hearing.” 79 Fed. Reg. at 59,941 (proposed R.C.M. 405(h)(4)) (emphasis added). Further, a new discussion section explains:
Although Mil. R. Evid. 412(b)(1)(C) allows admission of evidence of the victim’s sexual behavior or predisposition at trial when it is constitutionally required, there is no constitutional requirement at an Article 32 hearing. There is likewise no constitutional requirement for a pretrial hearing officer to consider evidence under Mil. R. Evid. 513(d)(8), and 514(d)(6) at an Article 32 hearing.
79 Fed. Reg. at 59,950.
The proposal also provides a new definition of the term “matters in mitigation” for the purpose of an Article 32 preliminary hearing:
For the purposes of this rule, “matters in mitigation” are defined as matters that may serve to explain the circumstances surrounding a charged offense.
79 Fed. Reg. at 59,941. The changes do not modify the definition of “matter in mitigation” found in R.C.M. 1001(c)(1)(B).
Other interesting proposed changes include:
This public notice set for publication tomorrow in the Federal Register announces that a meeting of the Judicial Proceedings Panel (JPP) (creation discussed here) will be held on Thursday, August 7, 2014, at The George Washington University Law School, Faculty Conference Center, 5th Floor, 716 20th Street NW., Washington, DC 20052. The Public Session will begin at 10:00 a.m. and end at 5:00 p.m. The agenda is:
- 8:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m.Administrative Session (41 CFR § 160(b), closed to the public)
- 10:00 a.m.-10:10 a.m.Comments from the Panel Chair
- 10:10 a.m.-11:00 a.m.Military Justice Discussion and Legislation Update
- 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.Discussion of the Response Systems to Adult Sexual Assault Crimes Panel Report
- 12:00 p.m.-1:00 p.m.Lunch
- 1:00 p.m.-2:30 p.m.Rape and Sexual Assault Laws in the United States
- 2:30 p.m.-4:00 p.m.Evolution of Article 120 of the UCMJ
- 4:00 p.m.-4:45 p.m.Panel Deliberations
- 4:45 p.m.-5:00 p.m.Public Comment
The notice also states that the panel’s website is http://jpp.whs.mil/ but it looks like the site isn’t live.
I’ve just returned to North Carolina after the CAAF CLE and while I’ll likely post some thoughts about the substance of the program in the next few days, I want to immediately convey my gratitude to the judges, the court staff, and the participants who made that incredible program happen. Thank you.
The conference is taking shape.
Here is a link to the presenters.
Some interesting and relevant topics.
I’m particularly pleased to see Prof. Witt on the panel, I have recommend his book, “Lincoln’s Code,” previously as worth the read. Prof. Bibas might also be good if he discusses Brady issues and other contributions to wrongful convictions, see an earlier post.
Georgetown Law School.
20-21 May 2014.
CAAF Judicial Conference.
More to follow.
The next meeting of the Response Systems Panel will occur on May 5-6 at The George Washington University Law School
According to this public notice, the next meeting of the Response Systems to Adult Sexual Assault Crimes Panel will occur on May 5-6, 2014, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each day, at The George Washington University Law School Faculty Conference Center, 5th floor, 716 20th Street NW., Washington, DC 20052.
The agenda is:
May 5, 2014
• 8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m. Comments from the Panel Chair
• 8:35 a.m.–9:30 a.m. DoD SAPRO Update Major General Jeffrey J. Snow Director, DoD SAPRO
• 9:30 a.m.–12:30 p.m. Subcommittee Report to Panel and Panel Deliberations
• 12:30 p.m.–1:00 p.m. Lunch
• 1:00 p.m.–4:30 p.m. Subcommittee Report to Panel and Panel Deliberations
• 4:30 p.m.–5:00 p.m. Public Comment
May 6, 2014
• 8:30 a.m.–12:00 p.m. Subcommittee Report to Panel and Panel Deliberations
• 12:00 p.m.–12:30 p.m. Lunch
• 12:30 p.m.–4:30 p.m. Panel Deliberations
• 4:30 p.m.–5:00 p.m. Public Comment*
* Public comment may occur earlier in the day if Panel deliberations conclude prior to 4:30 p.m. It is anticipated that the subcommittees will report to the Panel in the following order: Comparative Systems Subcommittee; Victim Services Subcommittee; Role of the Commander Subcommittee. However, the order of the subcommittee reports may change.
Congress created the Code Committee in Article 146 (10 U.S.C. § 946) and mandated that it “shall meet at least annually and shall make an annual comprehensive survey of the operation of this chapter.” The committee consists of the judges of CAAF, each service JAG and the SJA to the CMC, and two members of the public appointed by SECDEF.
It met on March 11, 2014, the meeting was open to the public, and I attended. Here is a summary of my notes.
This year’s annual Code Committee meeting is next Tuesday, and it looks like the weather will cooperate nicely (dry, partly cloudy, and highs near 70). Like last year, I’m attending in my personal capacity, and I plan to head out for a local lunch afterward. If any readers will be at the meeting or want to link up afterward, please let me know. You can send me a message at email@example.com, or you can meet me at the meeting (I’ll be the guy in a suit sitting in the back of the room and taking notes).
Annual Code Committee meeting set for March 11, 2014. CAAF Judicial Conference to occur sometime later this spring
CAAF’s website has this notice of the annual meeting of the Code Committee on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, at 10 a.m.
However, the annual Judicial Conference and CLE, that was cancelled last year due to apparent budget constraints affecting many regular participants (as discussed in this post), will not occur at its traditional time in conjunction with the Code Committee meeting. Instead, according to this notice on the court’s website:
The Court’s annual Judicial Conference and Continuing Legal Education Program, which has been held in March in past years, will not take place in March this year. Efforts are being made to schedule the conference later in the spring.
The next meeting of the Response Systems to Adult Sexual Assault Crimes Panel will occur on Jan. 30 at The George Washington University Law School
The Federal Register notice is out for the next public meeting of the Response Systems Panel, last discussed in this post where the No Man noted that:
DoD’s panel to study sexual assault and military justice policy is apparently meeting behind closed doors, even when hearing from just legal experts. Coverage here (US News).
The meeting will be held on Thursday, January 30, 2014 from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at The George Washington University Law School, Faculty Conference Center, 5th Floor, 716 20th Street NW., Washington, DC 20052. The agenda is:
- 8:30 a.m.-8:40 a.m. Comments from the Panel Chair
- 8:40 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Perspectives on Commanders in the Military Justice Process from Retired and Former Military Commanders
- 12:30 p.m.-1:00 p.m. Lunch
- 1:00 p.m.-1:15 p.m. Public Comment
- 1:15 p.m.-1:45 p.m. Role of the Commander Subcommittee Report to Panel
- 1:45 p.m.-5:00 p.m. Panel Deliberations
The next meeting of the Response Systems to Adult Sexual Assault Crimes Panel will occur on December 11-12 at the University of Texas-Austin
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 included numerous provisions related to sexual assault in the military (discussed in depth in this post). Section 576 stated:
The Secretary of Defense shall establish a panel to conduct an independent review and assessment of the systems used to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate crimes involving adult sexual assault and related offenses under section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), for the purpose of developing recommendations regarding how to improve the effectiveness of such systems.
The result is the Response Systems to Adult Sexual Assault Crimes Panel (link to official website). Its next meeting will occur on December 11-12, 2013, at the University of Texas-Austin, San Jacinto Residence Hall, Multi-Purpose Room 0207, 309 E 21st Street, Austin, TX 78705. The meeting is open to the public.
Further details including the meeting’s agenda are available in this public notice in the Federal Register.
First, in case you are looking to change jobs or for something to do after you successfully defend against removal from your job and an improper mental health referral, CAAF has job openings, here.
Odd reports comesng out on the DOD IG’s potential resolution of Maj Weirick’s complaint against the Commandant of the Marine Corps. Here is a Marine Corps Times story relating a WSJ story and why it is that the DOD IG investigation only addresses favoritism allegations and not the broader unlawful command influence allegations.
Sen. Kirsten Gillinrand’s alternative legislation to amendt the UCMJ failed to make it to a vote. See Rochester Democrat report here. The Senate will take up the Authorization bill and possibly her amendment on Dec 9th.
Another Navy officer’s career is tanked by the Fat Leonard bribery scandal, here.
Some lawmakers are concerned about. unscrupulous consumer practices, particularly home lending, targeting servicemembers, here.