CAAF recently granted review in two cases. First is an Air Force case that looks to be a Barberi (CAAFlog case page) trailer:

No. 14-0384/AF. U.S. v. Patrick J. HUEY, Jr. CCA 38139. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE GENERAL VERDICT OF GUILT RESTED ON CONDUCT THAT WAS CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED, IN THAT AT LEAST ONE OF THE IMAGES PRESENTED TO THE FINDER OF FACT WAS NOT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Second is an Army case:

No. 14-0453/AR. U.S. v. James S. PIREN. CCA 20110416. Review granted on the following issues:

I.    WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HER DISCRETION BY OVERRULING THE DEFENSE COUNSEL’S SCOPE OBJECTION DURING THE GOVERNMENT’S CROSS-EXAMINATION OF APPELLANT.

II.   WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY DENYING THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS RESULTS OF THE DNA ANALYSIS.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

I can’t find opinions from either CCA on their websites.

Comments are closed.